We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
The main objectives of police is usually to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all make certain law and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents in the boy or Woman usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they might Slash off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Unfortunately, that was not legitimate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son advised his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to owning sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
Generally speaking, higher courts do not have direct oversight over the reduce courts of record, in that they cannot arrive at out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments of your reduce courts.
PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Various judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name around the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with recognized legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, It's also a effectively-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case law within a particular court. Indeed, Each and every circuit has its own set of binding case law. Because of this, a judgment rendered during the Ninth Circuit will not be binding within the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should manage to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[four]
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as combined systems of legislation.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a nicely-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or here evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.